ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical effect of two kinds of internal fixation of locking plate and anatomical plate in the treatment of Pilon fracture.Methods 64 patients with Pilon fracture undergoing elective surgery were randomly divided into study group and control group by digital table method,32 cases in each group.The study group received locking plate internal fixation for the treatment,the control group was treated with anatomical plate internal fixation.The clinical efficacy and safety of two kinds of internal fixation methods were compared.Results After treatment,the excellent rate of ankle joint function in the study group(96.88%)was significantly higher than that in the control group (81.25%),and the difference had statistical ssignificance (χ2 =4.01,P 0.05).Conclusion Locking plate fixation in the treatment of Pilon fractures could significantly promote the recovery of joint function,and has the advantages of short operation time,fast fracture healing,less complications and other advantages,it is better than anatomical plate internal fixation.